home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
CD ROM Paradise Collection 4
/
CD ROM Paradise Collection 4 1995 Nov.iso
/
edu
/
essy53.zip
/
36.DOC
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1995-07-11
|
11KB
|
185 lines
ESSAY 36
THE "DON'T SPANK CHILDREN" MYTH
Society seems ready to self-destruct. SAT scores have
plummeted nearly 80 points since 1960, even though the test
was made easier. During the same period of time, violent
crime rose 560 percent. (Gary Bauer, WASHINGTON WATCH, April
5, 1993, p. 2). Violence has moved into schools. Drug abuse
among youth is rampant. Births to unmarried mothers set a
record of 1,165,384 in 1990--an increase of 75 percent from
1980-1990. (Associated Press, 2/28/93).
From 1961 to 1986, the suicide rate among adolescents
rose 300 percent. Suicide is the third leading cause of
death in persons 14-25 years of age. It is the second lead-
ing cause of death among college students. (GUIDE TO THE
PREVENTION OF SUICIDE AND SELF-DESTRUCTIVE BEHAVIOR. Depart-
ment of the Army Pamphlet 600-70; Government Printing
Office, 1986, p. 1).
The existence of the nuclear family is threatened.
Thirty-one million preborn children have been murdered since
1973. An untold number of newborn children have been murder-
ed. Child abuse is on the rise. The educational elite teach
that it is improper to use corporal correction. Is there any
connection between the lack of discipline in our society and
some of the social problems listed above? I think so.
According to William Bennett, the educational elite are
nihilists, that is, they are attempting to destroy the
Judeo-Christian philosophy that guided our society previous-
ly. They are replacing it with a "politically correct"
philosophy. One aspect of their agenda is to teach that it
is improper to spank children.
Dr. Sears gives ten "reasons" for not spanking. I
believe they are rationalizations. [William Sears, MD, and
Martha Sears, RN, THE DISCIPLINE BOOK (New York: Little,
Brown and Company, 1995), pp. 146-156]. Maybe he fears that
in our present society, parents would physically abuse their
children. Maybe he wants to be accepted by the "politically
correct" elite. Maybe he has been brainwashed by secular
educational institutions. (We all have been brainwashed to
some degree. This is not a personal attack on Dr. Sears.)
Here are his ten "reasons" with my comments in brackets:
1. HITTING MODELS HITTING.
[Hitting SHOULD be corrected by spanking. The pain
experienced by the child will stop him from hit-
ting children.]
2. HITTING DEVALUES THE CHILD.
[A child who is not corrected will grow up with
low self esteem. See chapter fifteen, "Sancti-
fication," of my book, HOW TO RAISE YOUR SELF
ESTEEM: PROVEN BIBLICAL PRINCIPLES.]
3. HITTING DEVALUES THE PARENT.
[A parent who does not discipline his child will
suffer the experience of watching his child fail
in life. Spanking when necessary is part of
discipline. This will eventually result in the
child internalizing this external discipline. The
child becomes self-disciplined, which prepares him
better for life.]
4. HITTING MAY LEAD TO ABUSE.
[Lack of self-control on the part of the parent
may result in physical abuse. Most parents control
themselves. Lack of self-control of parents is
also expressed by NOT spanking their children.]
5. HITTING DOES NOT IMPROVE BEHAVIOR.
[Discipline, which includes reward and corporal
correction, DOES improve behavior.]
6. HITTING IS ACTUALLY NOT BIBLICAL.
[Spanking IS biblical.]
7. HITTING PROMOTES ANGER--IN CHILDREN AND PAR-
ENTS.
[Spanking satisfies a sense of justice in the mind
of the child and removes damaging guilt. Correct
spanking does not cause anger in child or parent.]
8. HITTING BRINGS BACK BAD MEMORIES.
[Correct spanking reinforces the child's belief
that his parents love him enough to discipline
him. This assurance will stay with the child the
rest of his life.]
9. SPANKING HAS BAD LONG-TERM EFFECTS.
[Harsh, uncaring parents hurt their children.
Those who love their children will discipline
them.]
10. SPANKING DOESN'T WORK.
[Spanking works when parents are submitted to the
LORD and walking in love toward each other and
their children. Four thousand years of human
experience have proven this. The recent pseudo-
scientific findings that denounce corporal correc-
tion have been disproven by their own results--
permissiveness has spawned childhood murder, drug
abuse, abortion, STD, etc. How sad that children
must suffer for the sins of their parents.]
Dr. and Mrs. Sears have some good things to say, but the
book should be read under the critical review of the Bible.
See Psychologist James dobson for a more sane approach
to corporal correction. [James Dobson, THE STRONG-WILLED
CHILD (Wheaton: Tyndale House Publishers, Inc., 1978)].
I have studied the moral and intellectual nature of
human beings both academically and by observation. One of
the worse forms of child abuse is the failure of parents
to discipline their children. Children intuitively know if
parents love them by the safety barriers they build around
their children. If children are rewarded for proper behavior
and corrected for bad behavior, they feel secure and loved.
If a parent feels that he was overdisciplined by his
parents, he will probably overreact by underdisciplining his
children. Eventually, the parent should see his error and
the pendulum will swing the other way. That is, unless the
so-called experts convince parents to act contrary to what
parents intuitively know and have successfully done for
thousands of years.
It is psychologically sound to spank a child when he
has done something to deserve a spanking. He "pays" for
the wrongdoing, and debilitating guilt is removed. More
important, he is trained to behave properly--it aids in his
socialization process. If a child is allowed to do things
that are morally wrong, then he may develop a sociopathic
personality and end up on drugs, with AIDS, in prison or
worse.
It has been my observation that if a child is spanked
during his elementary years, he will not need it during high
school years. The external discipline will have been inter-
nalized by the child. Hence, the goal of self-discipline
for the child has been reached by that time.
Children should be rewarded far more than corrected. A
good positive attitude of the parents toward their children
is essential. Parents' confidence in their children will
instill self-confidence in the children. Affection such as
a hug, kind words, and verbal approval of good behavior of
their children is a must for parents.
The First Lady states parents' task well when she says,
. . .there is not a more important task for any of
us than to focus our energies to give our children
the right combination of love, discipline and
attention. This, so that each may grow and develop
to become whatever it is God meant each of them to
be. As adults, this is our primary responsibility.
(Dotson Rader, "Hillary Rodham Clinton: A Word To
Families," PARADE, April 11, 1993, p. 16).
To The First Lady's admonition, we must emphasize the bibli-
cal command for parents to train their children in the
knowledge of the Lord.
Verbal, physical, or sexual abuse of children is very
damaging to them. It must be stopped as soon as it is
recognized. Some parents may abuse their children because
their parents abused them. The chain can be broken.
My professional opinion is that the intellectual elite
and their disciples are angry and are rebelling against
proper authority. Since they have rejected the God of the
Bible, they have rejected basic truths and have rationalized
their sin. This has resulted in blindness in certain areas.
One of these areas is spanking.
The position taken against corporal correction is an
arrogant one. The educational and professional elite assert
that they are smarter than King Solomon and the One who in-
spired him to write:
He who spares the rod [instrument for spanking,
not beating] hates his son, but he who loves him
is diligent to discipline him. (Proverb 13:24,
RSV).
Train up a child in the way he should go, and when
he is old he will not depart from it. (Proverb
22:6, RSV).
Tragically, many parents have accepted the dogmatic pronun-
ciations of the so-called experts uncritically and their
children have suffered for it. It is part of a heinous
social experiment gone bad. Hence, some of the grievous
social problems enumerated in the first paragraph.
EVERY CHILD HAS A RIGHT
TO A FAMILY WHO LOVES HIM ENOUGH
TO DISCIPLINE HIM!
END